I also had to use a RAW processor that I know handles fine detail particularly well. Both are DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex) cameras that are equipped with a full frame sensor. bigger, or full-resolution or camera-original files to explore on your computer (mobile devices rarely can display the full resolution files at full resolution.) On top of that, the Mark IV will dramatically improve your workflow when compared to the 5DSR. I recently own a 5DSR and I have not noticed any moire problems usually associated with not having the LP filter. Even regular operations with Sony just seem to be sluggish in comparison the the Canon. Yes, dear readers, the rumors are true: Canon has two new flagship DSLR cameras. In my view it remains the best option on the market for this niche, despite not being the best camera on paper. La Paz Village, 11 November 2015. What about using a different RAW processor for the files. Costs US$3,198 ($700 cheaper than Canon’s 5DSR – the version without the AA filter) A few more points comparing the Sony a7RII to the Canon 5DS/R. I'd recommend that you buy the 5DSR instead because it's supposed to be sharper without the LP filter. The 5DS R has a resolution of 50.3 megapixels, whereas the 6D provides 20 MP. The 5Ds R does have an AA filter, it just has an additional special one to mostly cancel the first. B&H and Canon are selling the Canon EOS 5DSR for $1,499 NEW and the 5DS for $1,399. The menu system and buttons are so easy and so simple that I can just get on with the actual work without delay or hesitation. In February 2015, Canon released what I think is the best architectural camera made so far. Score . My inclination is to suspect that Canon makes a hefty profit on this…. Phones can … The reason why this matters is because when I’m working for a client, the 5DSR never gets in the way of what I’m trying to do. On a Sony camera the corners and edges of the frame appear softer and on Fujifilm the lenses demonstrate visible distortions. The 5DsR employs dual Digic6 processors to make this happen. The answer is quite subjective. I had to go to a significant magnification to see differences clearly. I suspect not, since I did a comparison of the 1Ds/1Ds mk3/5Ds from a printmaking POV when I first got the 5Ds. As a professional photographer who specializes in shooting in some of the most extreme environments on earth, he tests his body - and his gear - to the limits. My own reason for getting the 5Ds was cost and a suspicion that the kind of work I do was likely to introduce moire effects – often in shots I couldn’t repeat. Do I ever look at any of those images at 500%? no. Most people seem to think that Sony is worse, but I can tell you from extensive experience that Fujifilm has by far the worst, most terrible menu system that I’ve ever used. One of the things that always tends to grind my gears with regards to mirrorless cameras right now is just how slow they are even when it comes to the most basic operations. It’s this second filter that adds to the cost. My personal take is that I saved a few hundred quid ;-), If you feel that the 5Ds R makes a difference, then good, you’re happy with your camera too ;-). It’s been a whole three and a half years since Canon announced the 5D Mark III — a camera that was already criticized by many as not quite enough of an upgrade compared to the Mark II when it launched. Shooting the 5DSR is totally familiar - it feels and shoots just like the 5D Mark III. Nikon comes close, but they’re just not quite there. Yes, I now know that you can take slightly sharper photos with the 5Ds R. Actually, knowing the physics and optics, it’s pretty much exactly what I thought the difference would be. Score. Rumors suggest a 75MP (or possibly a bit higher) sensor resolution. Check Price Now ! The AA filter does its job at the cost of softening the image ever so slightly. Yes, the 5DSR does have better image quality, however, image quality is not really that important when comparing cameras at this level. I suspect that Canon might still do the with/without option for financial reasons. Canon have the best overall system for architectural photography because the 5DSR is easy to use and the lenses are the best on the market. I absolutely love the Canon 5DsR. It’s far too unreliable in a professional setting because there are too many occasions where the camera won’t register the lens, or the camera will crash or certain features become unresponsive which has been frustrating to me in a professional setting. Canon EOS 5DS R Digital SLR with Low-Pass Filter Effect Cancellation (Body Only) 9.8. A resource for working professional photographers and design industry professionals featuring news, commentary, equipment resources, and original articles. I’m aware some of you may want to point out the Sony options or Fujifilm medium format cameras, but, nothing comes close to how good the Canon 5DS R is. If I’d made 36″ x 24″ prints from the images, would anyone see the difference? The only other drawback besides the sticker price is the poor ISO performance. My guess is they're getting ready to drop that line of cameras, but I tried to buy a refurbished version of the 5DSR only a couple of weeks ago and it came without the AF working correctly so I sent it back, but I paid $1599 and I'm very grateful it didn't work!! Ian’s experience with moire on the 5Ds R suggests it’s not the issue I thought it might be, and with a higher pixel count, ‘natural’ anti aliasing from lens limitations and residual camera movement may well reduce its occurrence anyway. I am looking forward to seeing how this camera evolves with future updates, but it’s still a great buy even today. Canon cameras have more accessories and are more compatible with those accessories than any other manufacturer on the market. Yes, the 5DsR has a slightly lower burst rate and rated buffer size than the 5D3, but when one considers that more than twice as much data is moving through that pipeline the insignificant reduction is pretty impressive. Every other retailer chose a method that works and Argos thought, no, we’ll do something different, because we can – A focus group or putting this camera in the hands of working pros and listening to feedback would have averted many of these issues.Canon, on the other hand, is the easiest most simple camera I’ve ever had the pleasure to shoot with. I’ve used DxO Optics Pro for many years for finest detail, particularly in my black and white photography. I shoot with my Sony and Fuji cameras far more than I do with my Canon cameras. At 50.6 Megapixels, it's the highest resolution sensor in the history of EOS. This is due to the workaround that had to be implemented to tether as the Sony and Fuji APIs do not allow access to files the same way that Canon’s does. The Canon EOS 5DS R and the Canon EOS 6D are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in February 2015 and September 2012. At 100% I’m really not seeing much of a difference in this simple comparison. For me, as a person already owning a 5DsR, I’ll happily keep using that and see what comes from Canon in the future before I make any moves. The AA filter slightly blurs your image to reduce the incidence of false image detail (‘aliasing’) appearing at the finest scale. Having distortions in your image negates some of the most important benefits of a well-made tilt shift: their lack of distortion! It is, essentially, a new sensor in the same 5D3 body. Don’t get me wrong, from an image quality POV I’ve no problems with the 5Ds and it has given me some superb images, but you do wonder…. Keith buys his UK used camera equipment and lenses from: MPB and Park Cameras, Site update: Thanks for everyone's support - work is still very sparse, but at least I've lots of videos, articles and reviews to write - if you've any suggestions or questions, please just let me know - Keith & Karen, Using the right professional photographer, Architecture, interior and construction photography, High Resolution Images and Panoramic Photography, Location based industrial product photography, Entire site and contents © Copyright 2003-20 Keith Cooper |, comparison of the 1Ds/1Ds mk3/5Ds from a printmaking POV, Digital Black and White photography and printing, Privacy, affiliate marketing and cookies policy. And yet, the 5DSR is still a better option. a7RII is much smaller in size; a7RII has a screen that can flip up or down; a7RII has three dedicated adjustment dials (allowing you to quickly control aperture, shutter speed, and ISO). For architecture I find that it’s more important to have a fantastic lens and rely on that for the image quality rather than aspects like dynamic range or a few extra megapixels. For this reason the Canon 5DSR is the best camera you can buy for architectural photography. I’m aware that you can adapt lenses onto mirrorless cameras, however, they never work as well as they do on their respective native mounts. I was discussing some imaging matters with a specialist pro photographer I know, Ian Humes, who specialises in a particular type of survey photography, and has a 5Ds R. He also wondered if there was much difference beyond price…. This is not a subjective point, the 5DSR is faster and easier to use. I just buy my Canon eos 5dsr , and i had for one year also the 6d . I think 5dsr worth the money for more details , colors, wider field of view. Product Name. The high resolution sensor produces some of the most detailed and high quality images; especially when coupled with Canon’s tilt-shift lenses. And in another nice surprise, I got to shoot one for a couple of dives at the Digital Shootout. Fact is that most, if not all current mirrorless cameras are still slower.
2020 is the canon 5dsr worth it